scAtria | Statistics

Study footprint Study footprint Which studies can dominate cross-study comparisons?

Open section

Technique Technique coverage Which spatial technologies anchor the catalog?

Current section

Anatomy Anatomy coverage Which tissues are broadly represented?

Open section

Cell ontology Cell ontology comparability Which cell labels are reusable across studies?

Open section

Technique coverage

Platform coverage

Technique Modality

By technique

Technique	Modality	Datasets	Curated	Samples	Cells
CODEX	Spatial proteomics	18	17	1,625	29,954,127
Xenium	Spatial transcriptomics	18	14	245	28,858,054
CosMx	Spatial transcriptomics	24	18	1,035	22,197,944
MERFISH	Spatial transcriptomics	10	8	227	15,976,076
IMC	Spatial proteomics	9	9	4,201	12,063,964
Visium HD	Spatial transcriptomics	5	5	67	7,748,903
CyCIF	Spatial proteomics	1	1	31	3,293,552
CosMx-P	Spatial proteomics	2	1	6	1,638,193
CmTSA	Spatial proteomics	1	1	2	1,564,537
MIBI	Spatial proteomics	2	2	88	1,478,882
Other ST	Spatial transcriptomics	1	1	137	1,156,046
Stereo	Spatial transcriptomics	1	1	3	1,071,400
Atera	Spatial transcriptomics	1	1	2	887,633
ISS	Spatial transcriptomics	1	1	52	592,421

By modality

Modality	Datasets	Curated	Samples	Cells
Spatial transcriptomics	61	49	1,768	78,488,477
Spatial proteomics	33	31	5,953	49,993,255